Nengi Banigo-Abah and Ahiakwo Abraham in their article, Maritime Boundary Disputes and the Rule of Law: A Legal Appraisal of the South China Sea and its Relevance to Nigeria, critically examine the legal regime governing maritime disputes in the South China Sea (SCS). Banigo-Abah and Abraham evaluate the applicability of its normative, legal, and institutional lessons to Nigeria’s maritime governance and security challenges in the Gulf of Guinea (GoG). Both maritime regions, though located in different geopolitical contexts, Southeast Asia and West Africa were found to share striking similarities such as unresolved sovereignty disputes, contested maritime boundaries, illegal exploitation of marine resources, and fragile enforcement mechanisms. These parallels render the South China Sea a valuable case study for drawing lessons relevant to the evolving legal and security architecture of the Gulf of Guinea. The primary objective of the study was to assess how Nigeria could strengthen its legal and institutional frameworks to manage maritime threats, including piracy, armed robbery at sea, oil bunkering, and illegal fishing, while also addressing issues related to boundary delimitation and jurisdictional enforcement. A doctrinal and comparative legal methodology was employed, focusing on primary legal sources, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), relevant treaties, and case law. The findings indicate that while UNCLOS provided a comprehensive and widely accepted legal basis for maritime boundary delimitation, freedom of navigation, and resource management, its enforcement capacity remained weak, especially when confronted with the strategic interests of powerful states. Banigo-Abah and Abraham conclude that Nigeria could significantly enhance its maritime governance by adopting a multi-pronged strategy: strengthening its domestic legal framework, expanding institutional capacity for maritime enforcement, investing in diplomatic engagement through regional bodies, and utilising international adjudicatory mechanisms more effectively.