• Aggressive Tax Avoidance in Nigeria - Lifting the Corporate Veil as an Anti-Avoidance Tool

    Aggressive Tax Avoidance in Nigeria: Lifting the Corporate Veil as an Anti-Avoidance Tool

    0

    Derek Obadina, Associate Professor of Taxation, Lagos State University, in his article Aggressive Tax Avoidance in Nigeria: Lifting the Corporate Veil as an Anti-Avoidance Tool” examines tax avoidance and the deployment of corporate veil lifting as an anti-avoidance tool.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • nearly always a strike or lock out is unlawful in nigeria

    Nearly Always, A Strike or Lock Out is Unlawful in Nigeria

    0

    Professor Joseph Abugu, Head, Commercial and Industrial Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Lagos examines the lawfulness of strikes within the framework of statutory provisions delineating the boundaries of industrial action and the immunities available under Nigerian statute law for torts committed by trade unions and their officials in the course of a trade dispute. It observes that lawful strikes are virtually impossible in this country notwithstanding its democratic ideals. Whilst the constitution guarantees freedom of association and the right to join or form a trade union, existing statutory provisions negate the exercise of trade union activity in the form of strikes or lockouts. The paper advocates a change of the existing legal regime in favour of one that meaningfully recognizes the right to strike and lockout and facilitates its exercise.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3 - Print

    The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3 – Print

    0

    In this issue of  The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3, there are well researched articles on:

    • Corporate Governance
    • Energy Law
    • Media Law
    • Insolvency Law
    5,000.00
    Add to basket
  • The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3

    The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3

    0

    In this issue of  The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.3, there are well researched articles on:

    • Corporate Governance
    • Energy Law
    • Media Law
    • Insolvency Law
    5,000.00
    View products
  • The Role of Transaction Avoidance Mechanisms in Corporate Insolvency Law in Nigeria

    The Role of Transaction Avoidance Mechanisms in Corporate Insolvency Law in Nigeria

    0

    Business failure is a recurring phenomenon that cannot be ignored. Several factors contribute to corporate insolvency, including inefficient corporate management, corruption, the socio-political and economic environment, and government policies. Meanwhile, the primary financial burden of corporate insolvency is shifted to the creditors. They are therefore the most vulnerable and most exposed when a corporation fails. The protection of creditors in such situations has remained a challenging legal issue to address in a just and efficient manner, and options adopted have, in most instances, failed to offer full protection. Considering the above legal problem, Ejims Enwukwe, in his article, The Role of Transaction Avoidance Mechanisms in Corporate Insolvency Law in Nigeria, explores and analyzes the legal dynamics and complexities of transaction avoidance mechanisms in the protection of creditors under Nigerian insolvency law. Enwukwe concludes that transaction avoidance, when properly applied, has strong potential to protect creditors in corporate insolvency. This is without prejudice to some of the identified limitations of the mechanism. Nevertheless, the existing framework is a commendable start that Nigeria can further build on to better protect creditors in corporate insolvency. Enwukwe recommends legislative intervention to strengthen and optimize the role of transaction avoidance in protecting creditors in corporate insolvency.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • The Liability of Brand Influencing for Defective or Inappropriate Business Promotion and Marketing: A Review of the Applicable Laws in Nigeria

    The Liability of Brand Influencing for Defective or Inappropriate Business Promotion and Marketing: A Review of the Applicable Laws in Nigeria

    0

    Patrick Akwu and Aghoghomena Arhere, in their article, The Liability of Brand Influencing for Defective or Inappropriate Business Promotion and Marketing: A Review of the Applicable Laws in Nigeria, interrogate how the rise of social media has fundamentally transformed marketing strategies, with businesses increasingly relying on celebrities and influencers to promote their products and services. While these endorsements significantly enhance consumer reach and acceptance, they raise critical questions about liability when the products or services are defective, misleading, or harmful. Akwu and Arhere analyze the evolving regulatory landscape in Nigeria and examine the liability of brand influencers for engaging in defective advertising practices or promoting defective products and services. Akwu and Arhere explore the dual relationship that brand influencers maintain: contractually with product manufacturers through endorsement agreements, and through common law duties of care with their audience and followers. In conclusion, Akwu and Arhere establish that influencers must exercise due diligence in business promotion, as Nigeria’s current legal regime provides avenues for consumer redress and sanctions for deceptive advertising practices.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • The Premises for Regulating Social Media in Nigeria - A Critical Examination

    The Premises for Regulating Social Media in Nigeria: A Critical Examination

    0

    Social media has globally evolved over the years and impacted all sectors across boards. Its advent has revolutionised communication, social interaction, and information. However, the legal basis of regulating it has been an issue of discussion, considering its impacts on privacy, freedom of expression, and digital rights generally. Confidence Mbang, in his article, The Premises for Regulating Social Media in Nigeria: A Critical Examination, adopts the doctrinal approach and analytical/comparative methodology, basically analysing statutes, policies, guidelines, case laws, journals, articles, periodicals, international standards, and best practices, amongst others. Mbang examines regulatory actions by states and whether or not it conflicts with international standards. Mbang submits that while regulation is necessary to address national security, disinformation, and other pressing concerns, the same should be balanced with the observance of digital rights in line with best practices. Mbang recommends judicial review, harmonization of laws, digital literacy, and self-regulation/co-regulation as the way forward in regulating Social media.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • Innovatively Finding Financing For Nigeria's Energy Projects and Hostilities

    Innovatively Finding Financing For Nigeria’s Energy Projects and Hostilities

    0

    Samuel Dunmade, in his article, Innovatively Finding Financing For Nigeria’s Energy Projects and Hostilities, interrogates how energy projects in Nigeria can be financed within persistently hostile economic, regulatory, and socio-political conditions. Rather than rehearsing conventional project finance doctrine, it adopts a context-sensitive legal and financial analysis that evaluates both traditional and non-traditional financing instruments through their capacity to withstand structural risk. It proceeds from the premise that conventional financing models, when transposed uncritically, are ill-suited to environments characterised by regulatory uncertainty, macroeconomic volatility, and security risks, and advances the argument that bankability in Nigeria’s energy sector depends less on capital availability than on the legal engineering of financing structures that reallocate risk, protect cash flows, and align with global capital trends. By examining resource-backed financing, hybrid instruments, climate-aligned capital, and risk-transfer mechanisms, Dunmade contributes a pragmatic framework for structuring energy finance in high-risk jurisdictions.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • A Cross-Jurisdictional Legal and Risk Analysis for Corporate Board Oversight of Artificial Intelligence

    A Cross-Jurisdictional Legal and Risk Analysis for Corporate Board Oversight of Artificial Intelligence

    0

    The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in business brings new risks that company boards must take seriously. Joy Debski and Joshua Olewu, in their article, A Cross-Jurisdictional Legal and Risk Analysis for Corporate Board Oversight of Artificial Intelligence, look at how boards are expected to manage these risks as part of their duty to oversee company operations. Using a doctrinal comparative approach, Debski and Olewu examine four jurisdictions: the European Union, the U.S.A, China, and Nigeria to show how different laws and systems shape board responsibilities. Drawing from comparative statutory frameworks from selected jurisdictions, Debski and Olewu highlight areas of liability, compliance obligations, and ethical risks. They also draw on the agency and stewardship theories of corporate governance to analyze real-world examples, including Uber’s algorithmic misclassification and Amazon’s AI hiring bias case, to explain the need for Board oversight of AI. Based on the findings, Debski and Olewu suggest best practices for boards, provide recommendations for regulators and researchers, and call for more real-world studies on how boards are handling AI today.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • Neo-Colonial Influences and Corporate Governance Emergence A Case for Corporate Governance Divergence

    Neo-Colonial Influences and Corporate Governance Emergence A Case for Corporate Governance Divergence

    0

    Joy Debski, in her article, Neo-Colonial Influences and Corporate Governance Emergence: A Case for Corporate Governance Divergence, critiques neo-colonial corporate influences on Nigeria’s governance frameworks, questions governance convergence, and advocates for divergence to improve accountability through context-specific models. Using a comparative doctrinal research methodology, Debski analyzes corporate governance structures in the United Kingdom and Nigeria, relying on statutes, regulatory codes, corporate reports, and other secondary sources. The findings of this research reveal that while the United Kingdom’s principle-based “comply-or explain” model functions within its robust institutional environment, it is often unsuitable for Nigeria, where regulatory enforcement is weak, ownership structures are concentrated, and political interference persists. Nigeria’s governance challenges stem from regulatory inefficiency and executive dominance. The study is limited by its reliance on secondary data and focus on selected jurisdictions. Debski, however, offers a foundation for broader empirical research. Debski argues that governance divergence, grounded in local realities, is essential for effective corporate governance in Nigeria. The findings provide policymakers with a framework for balancing global best practices with localized accountability mechanisms.

    2,500.00
    Add to basket
  • The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2 - Print

    The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2 – Print

    0

    In this issue of  The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2, there are well researched articles on:

    • Maritime Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Energy Law
    • Employment Law
    • Legal Practice
    5,000.00
    Add to basket
  • The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2 - E-Book

    The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2 – E-Book

    0

    In this issue of  The Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law Vol.16 No.2, there are well researched articles on:

    • Maritime Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Energy Law
    • Employment Law
    • Legal Practice
    5,000.00
    Add to basket