Ayodele Adewole of the Department of Public Law, University of Jos in his rivetting article “Revisiting the Admissibility of Electronically Generated Bankers’ Books” analyses the provision of the Evidence Act, 2011 as it relates to the admissibility of electronically generated documents, especially bankers’ books. He considers whether the dichotomy between primary and secondary evidence is applicable to electronically generated evidence. He argues that the requirement for certification under section 84 places a difficult burden on the customer of a bank, who is the plaintiff in an action against the banker and has to prove a fact within the exclusive knowledge to the banker, who generates, stores and has custody of the record. In such a case, the interests of the party seeking to prove, and that of the party against who the document is sought to be proved is not coterminous, thereby resulting in frustration for the party seeking to prove the fact.